^IXIC vs. TQQQ

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 14.30%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 31.57% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) is 7.88%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.30%. This indicates that ^IXIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.